STScI Newsletter
2026 / Volume / Issue
About this Article
MAST StaffThe Impact of the MAST Data Archive (pre-print)
MAST's Impact
Here are the key takeaways from our paper:
- A modest investment in archiving data has an outsized impact and continues to return dividends for decades. One clear example of this is IUE, which continues to have a nearly-steady citation rate, despite being decommissioned in 1996. See the first image in the right ("Figure 7") for the specifics.
- For active missions, long-term archiving of data multiplies the science impact. MAST defines a paper as "archival" when there is no overlap between paper co-authors and the initial General Observer (GO) proposal team; after only 8 years of operations, the majority of HST papers published each year were (at least in part) archival. After 3 years, JWST is already at a ratio of 1:2 (archival:GO) for published papers. See "Figure 9" at right for a more complete picture.
- We believe our findings generalize beyond MAST and beyond astronomy. Well-funded archives with a long-term mission to make data accessible to everyone can reap the same benefits.
About the Paper
This publication is the culmination of decades of work by MAST staff. Collectively, we've analyzed 37,000 papers published in 40 journals over the last 50 years. Thank an archivist! Interested in learning more about how we performed this analysis? Check out the pre-print.
Number of papers published per year that analyzed HST (lighter shades) and JWST (darker shades, at right) data by author category. See legend: “None” means the author category could not be determined while "Part" means a partial archival paper (using a combination of GO and archival). This split-from-zero plot shows the number of papers authored by the original investigating team (GO) on the lower (below zero) y−axis.
